https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294511 A writ petition seeking a direction to register a money-laundering case was held not maintainable because the petitioner had already unconditionally withdrawn an earlier PIL on the same controversy and was pursuing an alternative statutory remedy before the Special Court. The HC applied the principle that the same relief cannot be revived in a fresh writ after withdrawal of prior proceedings, especially where an efficacious criminal-court remedy is available. It therefore declined interference on public policy grounds and sustained the preliminary objection. en-us Thu, 21 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 12 Nov 2024 14:16:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294511 A writ petition seeking a direction to register a money-laundering case was held not maintainable because the petitioner had already unconditionally withdrawn an earlier PIL on the same controversy and was pursuing an alternative statutory remedy before the Special Court. The HC applied the principle that the same relief cannot be revived in a fresh writ after withdrawal of prior proceedings, especially where an efficacious criminal-court remedy is available. It therefore declined interference on public policy grounds and sustained the preliminary objection. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 21 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294511