https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294511 The HC dismissed the writ petition against the Director of Enforcement, citing its non-maintainability due to public policy concerns. The court upheld the respondents' preliminary objection, emphasizing the withdrawal of a prior PIL and the availability of alternative remedies, such as approaching the Special Judge. The petitioner's legal status and advocate's authorization were scrutinized, and the discretionary nature of relief under Article 226 was considered. The court concluded that previous judgments applied, leading to the petition's dismissal. en-us Thu, 21 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 12 Nov 2024 14:16:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294511 The HC dismissed the writ petition against the Director of Enforcement, citing its non-maintainability due to public policy concerns. The court upheld the respondents' preliminary objection, emphasizing the withdrawal of a prior PIL and the availability of alternative remedies, such as approaching the Special Judge. The petitioner's legal status and advocate's authorization were scrutinized, and the discretionary nature of relief under Article 226 was considered. The court concluded that previous judgments applied, leading to the petition's dismissal. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 21 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294511