<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1967 (12) TMI 68 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294494</link>
    <description>The court set aside the Official Liquidator&#039;s order and remanded the case for fresh disposal, directing the liquidator to consider all relevant evidence, including the balance sheets and the alleged agreement, to determine whether the appellant&#039;s claim was within the limitation period. The court emphasized that the liquidator should act impartially and thoroughly examine the company&#039;s records to ensure a fair decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Apr 2021 17:47:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=642093" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1967 (12) TMI 68 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294494</link>
      <description>The court set aside the Official Liquidator&#039;s order and remanded the case for fresh disposal, directing the liquidator to consider all relevant evidence, including the balance sheets and the alleged agreement, to determine whether the appellant&#039;s claim was within the limitation period. The court emphasized that the liquidator should act impartially and thoroughly examine the company&#039;s records to ensure a fair decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294494</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>