<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1967 (12) TMI 68 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294494</link>
    <description>In liquidation proceedings, the Court may consider additional evidence on an appeal against the Official Liquidator&#039;s rejection of a creditor&#039;s proof and determine the claim afresh. An authenticated company balance sheet may also operate as an acknowledgment of liability under limitation law if it is properly signed by authorised persons and shows the debtor-creditor relationship; it is not automatically excluded because one signatory had an interest in the debt. The Court further noted that parol evidence may be used to connect balance-sheet entries with the creditor&#039;s claim. The rejection of the proof was therefore set aside and the matter remitted for fresh decision on all relevant material.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Apr 2021 17:47:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=642093" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1967 (12) TMI 68 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294494</link>
      <description>In liquidation proceedings, the Court may consider additional evidence on an appeal against the Official Liquidator&#039;s rejection of a creditor&#039;s proof and determine the claim afresh. An authenticated company balance sheet may also operate as an acknowledgment of liability under limitation law if it is properly signed by authorised persons and shows the debtor-creditor relationship; it is not automatically excluded because one signatory had an interest in the debt. The Court further noted that parol evidence may be used to connect balance-sheet entries with the creditor&#039;s claim. The rejection of the proof was therefore set aside and the matter remitted for fresh decision on all relevant material.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294494</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>