<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (1) TMI 18 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25210</link>
    <description>A statutory levy for delayed payment of sales tax was treated as a penalty where the scheme, marginal note, hearing requirement, reference to reasonable cause, and remission power showed a penal character. Section 38(2) did not convert the charge into interest merely because the amount was initially deposited; it only fixed the payable amount subject to reduction or waiver. The levy remained default-based and penal in substance, with wilfulness relevant. It was therefore not an allowable deduction in computing business income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 11:52:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=64208" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (1) TMI 18 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25210</link>
      <description>A statutory levy for delayed payment of sales tax was treated as a penalty where the scheme, marginal note, hearing requirement, reference to reasonable cause, and remission power showed a penal character. Section 38(2) did not convert the charge into interest merely because the amount was initially deposited; it only fixed the payable amount subject to reduction or waiver. The levy remained default-based and penal in substance, with wilfulness relevant. It was therefore not an allowable deduction in computing business income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25210</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>