https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406581 The court quashed the impugned orders and allowed the writ petitions, remitting the case to the respondent for fresh orders. The petitioner was directed to pay approximately Rs. 7,00,000 without extension, with the remittance subject to the final order post-remand. Lack of evidence supporting purchase suppression allegations led to the court's interference. The remand order was contingent on the petitioner fulfilling the payment undertaking, with non-compliance leading to automatic recall of the order and dismissal of writ petitions. No costs were awarded, and connected miscellaneous petitions were closed. en-us Mon, 15 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 17 Apr 2021 11:06:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406581 The court quashed the impugned orders and allowed the writ petitions, remitting the case to the respondent for fresh orders. The petitioner was directed to pay approximately Rs. 7,00,000 without extension, with the remittance subject to the final order post-remand. Lack of evidence supporting purchase suppression allegations led to the court's interference. The remand order was contingent on the petitioner fulfilling the payment undertaking, with non-compliance leading to automatic recall of the order and dismissal of writ petitions. No costs were awarded, and connected miscellaneous petitions were closed. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Mon, 15 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406581