https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406575 The court allowed the writ petitions, setting aside the impugned order imposing differential duty and penalty under the EPCG Scheme due to a violation of natural justice principles. The petitioners were denied the right to cross-examine witnesses, leading to the remittance of the matter to the first respondent. The court emphasized that the petitioners must be given the opportunity to cross-examine the witnesses whose statements were relied upon. The decision to facilitate cross-examination of co-noticees was left to the petitioners. The writ petitions were allowed without costs, and connected miscellaneous petitions were closed. en-us Fri, 19 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 28 Oct 2024 15:04:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406575 The court allowed the writ petitions, setting aside the impugned order imposing differential duty and penalty under the EPCG Scheme due to a violation of natural justice principles. The petitioners were denied the right to cross-examine witnesses, leading to the remittance of the matter to the first respondent. The court emphasized that the petitioners must be given the opportunity to cross-examine the witnesses whose statements were relied upon. The decision to facilitate cross-examination of co-noticees was left to the petitioners. The writ petitions were allowed without costs, and connected miscellaneous petitions were closed. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 19 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406575