<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (4) TMI 689 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406573</link>
    <description>The Adjudicating Authority (AA) found that the execution of a long-term lease for Ace Complex Land was not a condition precedent for approving the Resolution Plan but only for its effective date. The AA dismissed the appeal, stating that the appellant&#039;s challenges to the approved plan were unjustified attempts to evade obligations. The appellant was ordered to pay costs of Rs. 1 lakh.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Apr 2021 11:05:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=642061" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (4) TMI 689 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406573</link>
      <description>The Adjudicating Authority (AA) found that the execution of a long-term lease for Ace Complex Land was not a condition precedent for approving the Resolution Plan but only for its effective date. The AA dismissed the appeal, stating that the appellant&#039;s challenges to the approved plan were unjustified attempts to evade obligations. The appellant was ordered to pay costs of Rs. 1 lakh.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406573</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>