<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (4) TMI 687 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406571</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, concluding that they were not liable to pay service tax on the profit from mutual fund investments, were not engaged in trading of securities, did not need to maintain separate books of accounts for common input services, and that the substantial demand was time-barred due to the lack of suppression of material facts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Oct 2021 17:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=642059" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (4) TMI 687 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406571</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, concluding that they were not liable to pay service tax on the profit from mutual fund investments, were not engaged in trading of securities, did not need to maintain separate books of accounts for common input services, and that the substantial demand was time-barred due to the lack of suppression of material facts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406571</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>