<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (4) TMI 685 - ITAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406569</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed all twelve Miscellaneous Applications (MAs) filed by the Revenue, confirming that the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) rightly dismissed the appeals as the protective assessments had no standing once the substantive assessments were confirmed. The three MAs filed by the assessee were dismissed, upholding the tribunal&#039;s earlier decision that the income of family members should be assessed in the hands of Mr. Siya Ram Gupta.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2021 09:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=642057" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (4) TMI 685 - ITAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406569</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed all twelve Miscellaneous Applications (MAs) filed by the Revenue, confirming that the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) rightly dismissed the appeals as the protective assessments had no standing once the substantive assessments were confirmed. The three MAs filed by the assessee were dismissed, upholding the tribunal&#039;s earlier decision that the income of family members should be assessed in the hands of Mr. Siya Ram Gupta.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406569</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>