<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (4) TMI 677 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406561</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the deletion of the disputed amount as concealed income by the AO and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal. However, the Tribunal found the estimation of net profit at 11.17% to be legally flawed and directed its deletion. The AO was instructed to assess the income element if credit for the disputed amount was claimed by the assessee. The decision highlighted the necessity of substantial evidence and thorough verification in tax assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Apr 2021 11:05:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=642049" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (4) TMI 677 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406561</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the deletion of the disputed amount as concealed income by the AO and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal. However, the Tribunal found the estimation of net profit at 11.17% to be legally flawed and directed its deletion. The AO was instructed to assess the income element if credit for the disputed amount was claimed by the assessee. The decision highlighted the necessity of substantial evidence and thorough verification in tax assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406561</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>