<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (4) TMI 664 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406548</link>
    <description>The appeal challenged the reopening of assessment under Sec. 147 of the Income Tax Act and the disallowance of purchases from a specific party as alleged bogus. The tribunal found in favor of the assessee, ruling that the purchases were likely from the open market and not bogus. The CIT(A)&#039;s decision was set aside, and the matter was remanded to the Assessing Officer for adjustments based on the tribunal&#039;s directions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Apr 2021 11:04:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=642036" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (4) TMI 664 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406548</link>
      <description>The appeal challenged the reopening of assessment under Sec. 147 of the Income Tax Act and the disallowance of purchases from a specific party as alleged bogus. The tribunal found in favor of the assessee, ruling that the purchases were likely from the open market and not bogus. The CIT(A)&#039;s decision was set aside, and the matter was remanded to the Assessing Officer for adjustments based on the tribunal&#039;s directions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406548</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>