https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294484 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the demand of service tax and penalties. It held that the services provided by the appellants were distinct from Advertising Agency Services, relieving them from tax liability. The Tribunal also found that the demand was barred by limitation as there was no evidence of mala fide intention to evade tax. Additionally, the Tribunal concluded that the Revenue failed to prove suppression of facts, further supporting the appellant's case and ultimately allowing the appeal. en-us Fri, 30 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 17 Apr 2021 11:01:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294484 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the demand of service tax and penalties. It held that the services provided by the appellants were distinct from Advertising Agency Services, relieving them from tax liability. The Tribunal also found that the demand was barred by limitation as there was no evidence of mala fide intention to evade tax. Additionally, the Tribunal concluded that the Revenue failed to prove suppression of facts, further supporting the appellant's case and ultimately allowing the appeal. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 30 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294484