<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 1875 - ITAT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294483</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed penalty orders under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act due to defective notices lacking specific charges. However, penalties under Section 271AAB were upheld for undisclosed income derived from unrecorded cash transactions. The Tribunal&#039;s decisions aligned with the High Court&#039;s requirement for penalty notices to specify charges, resulting in varied outcomes based on individual circumstances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Apr 2021 11:01:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=642028" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 1875 - ITAT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294483</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed penalty orders under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act due to defective notices lacking specific charges. However, penalties under Section 271AAB were upheld for undisclosed income derived from unrecorded cash transactions. The Tribunal&#039;s decisions aligned with the High Court&#039;s requirement for penalty notices to specify charges, resulting in varied outcomes based on individual circumstances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294483</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>