<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (4) TMI 652 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406536</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the decision of the ITAT and dismissed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee and against the revenue. The judgment clarified the interpretation and applicability of Section 14A of the Income Tax Act, particularly in cases where no exempt income had been earned, based on previous judicial precedents and legal principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2021 08:56:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=641985" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (4) TMI 652 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406536</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the decision of the ITAT and dismissed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee and against the revenue. The judgment clarified the interpretation and applicability of Section 14A of the Income Tax Act, particularly in cases where no exempt income had been earned, based on previous judicial precedents and legal principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406536</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>