<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 2026 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294469</link>
    <description>The tribunal classified the power subsidy received by the assessee from the Government of Andhra Pradesh as a capital receipt, emphasizing its purpose to promote industrial investment. The tribunal overturned the lower authorities&#039; classification of the subsidy as a revenue receipt, citing the &quot;purpose test&quot; from relevant Supreme Court judgments. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the power subsidy was deemed a capital receipt.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2021 08:54:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=641948" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 2026 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294469</link>
      <description>The tribunal classified the power subsidy received by the assessee from the Government of Andhra Pradesh as a capital receipt, emphasizing its purpose to promote industrial investment. The tribunal overturned the lower authorities&#039; classification of the subsidy as a revenue receipt, citing the &quot;purpose test&quot; from relevant Supreme Court judgments. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the power subsidy was deemed a capital receipt.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294469</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>