https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294476 An FIR disclosing prima facie cognizable offences will not ordinarily be quashed in writ jurisdiction, as there is no basis to interdict the investigation at that stage; the request to quash the FIR was therefore rejected. However, on the facts presented, limited interim protection from arrest was considered appropriate to preserve the petitioner's liberty during investigation, so long as he cooperated with the investigating agency and appeared when required. The protection was to continue until submission of the police report under Section 173(2) CrPC. en-us Mon, 13 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 16 Apr 2021 08:54:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294476 An FIR disclosing prima facie cognizable offences will not ordinarily be quashed in writ jurisdiction, as there is no basis to interdict the investigation at that stage; the request to quash the FIR was therefore rejected. However, on the facts presented, limited interim protection from arrest was considered appropriate to preserve the petitioner's liberty during investigation, so long as he cooperated with the investigating agency and appeared when required. The protection was to continue until submission of the police report under Section 173(2) CrPC. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 13 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294476