<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 1747 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294474</link>
    <description>The High Court set aside the impugned order issued by the respondent Department regarding discrepancies in fulfilling Export Promotion Capital Goods (EPCG) obligations by the petitioner, a cotton yarn manufacturer. The Court found the respondent&#039;s failure to grant sufficient time for approaching the Settlement Commission violated principles of natural justice. Granting the petitioner four months to approach the Commission and deposit the outstanding amount, the Court emphasized the need for a personal hearing and fair consideration, ensuring compliance while balancing the petitioner&#039;s circumstances. The decision aimed to uphold due process and fairness in the proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2021 08:54:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=641941" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 1747 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294474</link>
      <description>The High Court set aside the impugned order issued by the respondent Department regarding discrepancies in fulfilling Export Promotion Capital Goods (EPCG) obligations by the petitioner, a cotton yarn manufacturer. The Court found the respondent&#039;s failure to grant sufficient time for approaching the Settlement Commission violated principles of natural justice. Granting the petitioner four months to approach the Commission and deposit the outstanding amount, the Court emphasized the need for a personal hearing and fair consideration, ensuring compliance while balancing the petitioner&#039;s circumstances. The decision aimed to uphold due process and fairness in the proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294474</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>