https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294473 Where statutory service rules applied to a Tribunal member under Section 10(1B) of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948 read with Rule 56 of the Uttar Pradesh Fundamental Rules and the Civil Service Regulations, pension and retiral benefits had to be determined under that framework. An executive Government Order could not override or curtail a benefit conferred by statute or statutory rules by declaring advocate-quota service non-pensionable. As the petitioner had completed the qualifying service required under the applicable rules, entitlement to retiring pension and other retirement benefits was upheld. en-us Mon, 03 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 16 Apr 2021 08:54:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294473 Where statutory service rules applied to a Tribunal member under Section 10(1B) of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948 read with Rule 56 of the Uttar Pradesh Fundamental Rules and the Civil Service Regulations, pension and retiral benefits had to be determined under that framework. An executive Government Order could not override or curtail a benefit conferred by statute or statutory rules by declaring advocate-quota service non-pensionable. As the petitioner had completed the qualifying service required under the applicable rules, entitlement to retiring pension and other retirement benefits was upheld. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Mon, 03 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294473