https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294473 The Court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the decision denying pension benefits to the claimant based on a Government Order. It was held that the service should be pensionable under Fundamental Rule 56 and Retirement Benefit Rules, emphasizing that statutory rules prevail over executive orders. The Court directed the respondents to pay pension and other retiral benefits to the petitioner in accordance with the law, stating that the executive order could not override the statutory provisions entitling government servants to retirement benefits. en-us Mon, 03 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 16 Apr 2021 08:54:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294473 The Court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the decision denying pension benefits to the claimant based on a Government Order. It was held that the service should be pensionable under Fundamental Rule 56 and Retirement Benefit Rules, emphasizing that statutory rules prevail over executive orders. The Court directed the respondents to pay pension and other retiral benefits to the petitioner in accordance with the law, stating that the executive order could not override the statutory provisions entitling government servants to retirement benefits. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Mon, 03 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294473