<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (3) TMI 250 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294463</link>
    <description>In a partnership dissolution suit, a preliminary decree must declare the parties&#039; proportionate shares before the final decree is passed under Order 20 Rule 15 CPC, and the prescribed form also contemplates that declaration. Where the pleadings and evidence showed equal shares, omission of the share declaration was treated as a drafting defect that did not alter the substantive position. The court held that the defect could be corrected by amendment of the preliminary decree, and the party need not be driven to appeal or review merely to cure a decree that failed to conform to the mandatory scheme of the Code.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2021 18:06:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=641919" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (3) TMI 250 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294463</link>
      <description>In a partnership dissolution suit, a preliminary decree must declare the parties&#039; proportionate shares before the final decree is passed under Order 20 Rule 15 CPC, and the prescribed form also contemplates that declaration. Where the pleadings and evidence showed equal shares, omission of the share declaration was treated as a drafting defect that did not alter the substantive position. The court held that the defect could be corrected by amendment of the preliminary decree, and the party need not be driven to appeal or review merely to cure a decree that failed to conform to the mandatory scheme of the Code.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294463</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>