https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294463 The Court allowed the revision petition, directing the rectification of the preliminary decree to declare the parties' proportionate shares in a partnership dissolution suit. Emphasizing compliance with statutory provisions, the Court held that the failure to specify shares was a clear omission that needed correction under Secs. 151 and 152 of the Civil Procedure Code. The judgment highlighted the importance of accurately reflecting parties' rights in decrees, even without a clerical error, to uphold legal requirements and ensure fairness in such cases. en-us Mon, 15 Mar 1976 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 15 Apr 2021 18:06:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294463 The Court allowed the revision petition, directing the rectification of the preliminary decree to declare the parties' proportionate shares in a partnership dissolution suit. Emphasizing compliance with statutory provisions, the Court held that the failure to specify shares was a clear omission that needed correction under Secs. 151 and 152 of the Civil Procedure Code. The judgment highlighted the importance of accurately reflecting parties' rights in decrees, even without a clerical error, to uphold legal requirements and ensure fairness in such cases. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 15 Mar 1976 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294463