https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294462 The Civil Judge upheld the fresh preliminary decree, aligning it with the Supreme Court and High Court directions. The appellants were granted interest up to March 13, 1950, limited to the claimed amount, and were instructed to account for property receipts from August 10, 1950. Despite dismissing the appeal initially, a discrepancy in rent accounting led to decree modifications for alignment with court judgments, ultimately resulting in the appeal's dismissal with costs. en-us Wed, 18 Nov 1964 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 15 Apr 2021 17:48:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294462 The Civil Judge upheld the fresh preliminary decree, aligning it with the Supreme Court and High Court directions. The appellants were granted interest up to March 13, 1950, limited to the claimed amount, and were instructed to account for property receipts from August 10, 1950. Despite dismissing the appeal initially, a discrepancy in rent accounting led to decree modifications for alignment with court judgments, ultimately resulting in the appeal's dismissal with costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 18 Nov 1964 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294462