https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294461 The suit was dismissed by the court due to the lack of Advocate-General's sanction under Section 92, Civil P. C. The court determined that the nature of the suit, involving trusteeship allegations and trust fund management, fell within the scope of Section 92, specifically Clauses (d) and (h). The appellant's argument against this classification was rejected, emphasizing that the suit's essence aligned with Section 92 requirements. Additionally, the court denied the amendment of the decree related to pleader's fee calculation, stating that specific remedies like review or appeal should be pursued instead of relying on Sections 151 and 152, Civil P. C. The appellants were directed to bear the costs of the appeal. en-us Tue, 28 Feb 1950 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 15 Apr 2021 17:38:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294461 The suit was dismissed by the court due to the lack of Advocate-General's sanction under Section 92, Civil P. C. The court determined that the nature of the suit, involving trusteeship allegations and trust fund management, fell within the scope of Section 92, specifically Clauses (d) and (h). The appellant's argument against this classification was rejected, emphasizing that the suit's essence aligned with Section 92 requirements. Additionally, the court denied the amendment of the decree related to pleader's fee calculation, stating that specific remedies like review or appeal should be pursued instead of relying on Sections 151 and 152, Civil P. C. The appellants were directed to bear the costs of the appeal. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 28 Feb 1950 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294461