<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (8) TMI 1007 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294459</link>
    <description>Where a Trust Act confers general power of appointment and promotion on a statutory Trust Board, the absence of State-framed rules for posts requiring professional skill does not disable the Board from acting by administrative decision or resolution. The Court held that the Act&#039;s scheme, including the State Government&#039;s supervisory control, did not make appointments void merely because rules under the relevant provision had not yet been framed. On that basis, promotions to the post of Assistant Engineer were sustained as valid in law, and the order quashing them was set aside. The direction requiring the State Government to frame rules was left undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2021 11:20:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=641905" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (8) TMI 1007 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294459</link>
      <description>Where a Trust Act confers general power of appointment and promotion on a statutory Trust Board, the absence of State-framed rules for posts requiring professional skill does not disable the Board from acting by administrative decision or resolution. The Court held that the Act&#039;s scheme, including the State Government&#039;s supervisory control, did not make appointments void merely because rules under the relevant provision had not yet been framed. On that basis, promotions to the post of Assistant Engineer were sustained as valid in law, and the order quashing them was set aside. The direction requiring the State Government to frame rules was left undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294459</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>