<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (4) TMI 609 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406493</link>
    <description>The court set aside the impugned non-speaking order and remitted the matter to the assessing officer for a fresh order in compliance with the law. The petitioner was permitted to file a supplementary petition with additional details, and the assessing officer was directed to consider all petitioner contentions in the new order under Section 220(6). The writ petition was granted without costs, and related miscellaneous petitions were closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2021 08:07:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=641886" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (4) TMI 609 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406493</link>
      <description>The court set aside the impugned non-speaking order and remitted the matter to the assessing officer for a fresh order in compliance with the law. The petitioner was permitted to file a supplementary petition with additional details, and the assessing officer was directed to consider all petitioner contentions in the new order under Section 220(6). The writ petition was granted without costs, and related miscellaneous petitions were closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406493</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>