https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406491 The Court dismissed the challenge to the provisional attachment order dated 25.2.2021, stating that the petitioners had alternative legal remedies available under the Prevention of Money-laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA Act). The Court emphasized that the petitioners could approach the adjudicating authority under Section 8 of the PMLA Act to challenge the provisional attachment order and that the order was subject to approval by the adjudicating authority. The Court concluded that the petitioners had sufficient legal recourse within the framework of the PMLA Act, disposing of the petition and granting the petitioners liberty to pursue available legal remedies. en-us Tue, 06 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 14 Apr 2021 10:45:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406491 The Court dismissed the challenge to the provisional attachment order dated 25.2.2021, stating that the petitioners had alternative legal remedies available under the Prevention of Money-laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA Act). The Court emphasized that the petitioners could approach the adjudicating authority under Section 8 of the PMLA Act to challenge the provisional attachment order and that the order was subject to approval by the adjudicating authority. The Court concluded that the petitioners had sufficient legal recourse within the framework of the PMLA Act, disposing of the petition and granting the petitioners liberty to pursue available legal remedies. Case-Laws Money Laundering Tue, 06 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406491