<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (4) TMI 604 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406488</link>
    <description>The High Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s order in an appeal under Section 35-G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, emphasizing the correct application of legal principles and precedents. The Court highlighted the entitlement of an input service distributor to distribute credit under Rule 7 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, and criticized the Tribunal for lacking reasoning. The penalty provisions under Rule 15(3) were differentiated based on the unamended and amended versions, with penalties being reduced or set aside depending on the circumstances and legal provisions applicable during the respective periods. The matter was remitted back to the Tribunal for a fresh decision in accordance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2021 12:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=641881" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (4) TMI 604 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406488</link>
      <description>The High Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s order in an appeal under Section 35-G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, emphasizing the correct application of legal principles and precedents. The Court highlighted the entitlement of an input service distributor to distribute credit under Rule 7 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, and criticized the Tribunal for lacking reasoning. The penalty provisions under Rule 15(3) were differentiated based on the unamended and amended versions, with penalties being reduced or set aside depending on the circumstances and legal provisions applicable during the respective periods. The matter was remitted back to the Tribunal for a fresh decision in accordance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406488</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>