<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (4) TMI 603 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406487</link>
    <description>In customs recovery proceedings involving auction of jointly owned property, the writ petition was disposed of after the authority&#039;s decision was placed on record, and the petitioner&#039;s request was treated as having been addressed. The matter therefore ended without further adjudication on the auction dispute, with the court recording the administrative position and closing the petition on that basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2021 08:07:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=641880" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (4) TMI 603 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406487</link>
      <description>In customs recovery proceedings involving auction of jointly owned property, the writ petition was disposed of after the authority&#039;s decision was placed on record, and the petitioner&#039;s request was treated as having been addressed. The matter therefore ended without further adjudication on the auction dispute, with the court recording the administrative position and closing the petition on that basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406487</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>