<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (4) TMI 573 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406457</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, holding that they were entitled to additional depreciation on the plant and machinery used for processing prawns. The Tribunal found that the CIT(A) and AO had not properly considered the nature of the assessee&#039;s business and the relevant legal provisions. The appeal was allowed, and the addition of Rs. 15,71,130/- was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2021 08:05:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=641850" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (4) TMI 573 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406457</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, holding that they were entitled to additional depreciation on the plant and machinery used for processing prawns. The Tribunal found that the CIT(A) and AO had not properly considered the nature of the assessee&#039;s business and the relevant legal provisions. The appeal was allowed, and the addition of Rs. 15,71,130/- was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406457</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>