<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (4) TMI 569 - COMMISSIONER (APPEALS) CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICE TAX, JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406453</link>
    <description>The seized goods were ordered to be confiscated under Section 130 of the CGST Act, with a fine imposed in lieu of confiscation. Penalties were imposed on the firm under Section 122(1)(xvi) and (xviii) of the CGST Act, and on the Partner under Section 122(3) of the CGST Act. The appeal was disposed of with the above orders upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2025 10:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=641846" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (4) TMI 569 - COMMISSIONER (APPEALS) CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICE TAX, JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406453</link>
      <description>The seized goods were ordered to be confiscated under Section 130 of the CGST Act, with a fine imposed in lieu of confiscation. Penalties were imposed on the firm under Section 122(1)(xvi) and (xviii) of the CGST Act, and on the Partner under Section 122(3) of the CGST Act. The appeal was disposed of with the above orders upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406453</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>