https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294451 The impugned NCLT order was set aside and the application restored for fresh consideration because the merits were not examined before the HC. The parties did not seek substantive adjudication at that stage, and the respondent's submission led the court to leave the matter to the Tribunal. The State was to be given an opportunity to respond to the notice and contest the proceedings before the NCLT, after which the application would proceed in accordance with law. en-us Fri, 22 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 15 Apr 2021 08:04:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294451 The impugned NCLT order was set aside and the application restored for fresh consideration because the merits were not examined before the HC. The parties did not seek substantive adjudication at that stage, and the respondent's submission led the court to leave the matter to the Tribunal. The State was to be given an opportunity to respond to the notice and contest the proceedings before the NCLT, after which the application would proceed in accordance with law. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 22 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294451