<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 1486 - ITAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294447</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the penalty notice lacking specificity under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act was void ab initio. As the notice did not clearly state the grounds for the penalty, it violated principles of natural justice. Relying on legal precedents emphasizing specificity in penalty notices, the Tribunal deemed the penalty imposed illegal and directed its deletion, allowing the appeal of the assessee. The judgment was pronounced on 14/02/2020.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2021 08:04:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=641838" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 1486 - ITAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294447</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the penalty notice lacking specificity under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act was void ab initio. As the notice did not clearly state the grounds for the penalty, it violated principles of natural justice. Relying on legal precedents emphasizing specificity in penalty notices, the Tribunal deemed the penalty imposed illegal and directed its deletion, allowing the appeal of the assessee. The judgment was pronounced on 14/02/2020.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294447</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>