<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 1873 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294445</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the relief sought by the Resolution Professional to release assets of the Corporate Debtor under a provisional attachment order and to quash the order. The conflict between the IBC moratorium and criminal proceedings under the PMLA Act was deliberated, with the Tribunal emphasizing that the moratorium does not extend to criminal cases. The Tribunal cited the pending appeal against the attachment order before the Appellate Tribunal of PMLA as a reason for dismissing the relief sought, highlighting the limitations of the IBC Adjudicating Authority in interfering with PMLA proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2021 08:04:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=641836" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 1873 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294445</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the relief sought by the Resolution Professional to release assets of the Corporate Debtor under a provisional attachment order and to quash the order. The conflict between the IBC moratorium and criminal proceedings under the PMLA Act was deliberated, with the Tribunal emphasizing that the moratorium does not extend to criminal cases. The Tribunal cited the pending appeal against the attachment order before the Appellate Tribunal of PMLA as a reason for dismissing the relief sought, highlighting the limitations of the IBC Adjudicating Authority in interfering with PMLA proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294445</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>