https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294455 The Supreme Court declined to interfere with the impugned interim order and dismissed the special leave petitions, noting that earlier SLPs against the same order had already been dismissed. It left the substantive question of law open for consideration in an appropriate case, without adjudicating the issue on merits. The Court also disposed of the pending interlocutory applications, fixed the matters for further listing after four weeks, and granted the parties liberty to place additional documents on record. en-us Fri, 29 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 15 Apr 2021 08:04:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294455 The Supreme Court declined to interfere with the impugned interim order and dismissed the special leave petitions, noting that earlier SLPs against the same order had already been dismissed. It left the substantive question of law open for consideration in an appropriate case, without adjudicating the issue on merits. The Court also disposed of the pending interlocutory applications, fixed the matters for further listing after four weeks, and granted the parties liberty to place additional documents on record. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 29 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294455