<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (9) TMI 33 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25185</link>
    <description>Exemption from building tax under the Kerala Panchayat Act turns on the statutory use of the building and its income. An auditorium attached to a temple was held not exempt because it was used for marriages, dramas and similar functions, and those uses were not shown to be connected with public worship; applying its income to temple purposes did not satisfy section 72(1)(b). For a sathram or choultry, the relevant enquiry is whether no rent is charged or the rent is applied exclusively to charitable purposes; the quantum of rent is not decisive. The charitable nature of the institution and use of income required reconsideration on the correct statutory basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 18:32:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=64183" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (9) TMI 33 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25185</link>
      <description>Exemption from building tax under the Kerala Panchayat Act turns on the statutory use of the building and its income. An auditorium attached to a temple was held not exempt because it was used for marriages, dramas and similar functions, and those uses were not shown to be connected with public worship; applying its income to temple purposes did not satisfy section 72(1)(b). For a sathram or choultry, the relevant enquiry is whether no rent is charged or the rent is applied exclusively to charitable purposes; the quantum of rent is not decisive. The charitable nature of the institution and use of income required reconsideration on the correct statutory basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25185</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>