https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406440 Allegations of clandestine removal of goods without invoice and large-scale duty evasion under the CGST Act were treated as grave economic offences. Offences under section 132(1)(a) to (d) were noted as cognizable and non-bailable where the statutory conditions were met, and arrest could be made on reasons to believe under section 69(1). The proprietor could not avoid responsibility by attributing business conduct to a manager. On the gravity of the accusation, severity of punishment, and public revenue loss, bail was refused and the application rejected. en-us Tue, 13 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 24 Mar 2025 17:35:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406440 Allegations of clandestine removal of goods without invoice and large-scale duty evasion under the CGST Act were treated as grave economic offences. Offences under section 132(1)(a) to (d) were noted as cognizable and non-bailable where the statutory conditions were met, and arrest could be made on reasons to believe under section 69(1). The proprietor could not avoid responsibility by attributing business conduct to a manager. On the gravity of the accusation, severity of punishment, and public revenue loss, bail was refused and the application rejected. Case-Laws GST Tue, 13 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406440