<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (4) TMI 548 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406432</link>
    <description>Depreciation on assets used by a charitable trust for charitable objects is allowable as application of income under section 11, and the allowance does not amount to impermissible double deduction merely because the acquisition cost was earlier treated as application of income. The governing principle, as applied by the Madras HC following the Supreme Court and earlier connected decisions, was decided in favour of the assessee, so the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2021 10:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=641749" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (4) TMI 548 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406432</link>
      <description>Depreciation on assets used by a charitable trust for charitable objects is allowable as application of income under section 11, and the allowance does not amount to impermissible double deduction merely because the acquisition cost was earlier treated as application of income. The governing principle, as applied by the Madras HC following the Supreme Court and earlier connected decisions, was decided in favour of the assessee, so the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406432</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>