<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (4) TMI 528 - ITAT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406412</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the assessee&#039;s claim of development expenses on an estimated basis for Assessment Years 2010-11 and 2013-14, finding the change in accounting policy reasonable and in line with Accounting Standard AS-5. The Tribunal also ruled that development charges received from customers should not be taxed twice, setting aside the CIT(A)&#039;s direction to tax a specific amount in a prior year. The revenue&#039;s appeals for both years were dismissed, and the Tribunal&#039;s decision was issued on 09.03.2021.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2021 11:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=641729" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (4) TMI 528 - ITAT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406412</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the assessee&#039;s claim of development expenses on an estimated basis for Assessment Years 2010-11 and 2013-14, finding the change in accounting policy reasonable and in line with Accounting Standard AS-5. The Tribunal also ruled that development charges received from customers should not be taxed twice, setting aside the CIT(A)&#039;s direction to tax a specific amount in a prior year. The revenue&#039;s appeals for both years were dismissed, and the Tribunal&#039;s decision was issued on 09.03.2021.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406412</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>