<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (4) TMI 522 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , KOCHI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406406</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Application seeking repayment from related parties, as the Resolution Professional failed to meet regulatory timelines and provide adequate evidence to establish preferential transactions. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of proper documentation and adherence to prescribed timelines in addressing preferential transactions under Section 43 of the I&amp;amp;B Code, ultimately leading to the rejection of the claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2021 08:46:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=641723" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (4) TMI 522 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , KOCHI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406406</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Application seeking repayment from related parties, as the Resolution Professional failed to meet regulatory timelines and provide adequate evidence to establish preferential transactions. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of proper documentation and adherence to prescribed timelines in addressing preferential transactions under Section 43 of the I&amp;amp;B Code, ultimately leading to the rejection of the claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406406</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>