<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (3) TMI 667 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294415</link>
    <description>An assessment order passed without notice or hearing was challenged as contrary to natural justice. As the absence of hearing was not disputed, the court held that interference was warranted and the matter should go back to the assessing authority. The impugned order was set aside, and the assessment was remitted for fresh consideration after treating the proceedings as notice to the petitioner, with all contentions left open.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2021 11:24:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=641671" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (3) TMI 667 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294415</link>
      <description>An assessment order passed without notice or hearing was challenged as contrary to natural justice. As the absence of hearing was not disputed, the court held that interference was warranted and the matter should go back to the assessing authority. The impugned order was set aside, and the assessment was remitted for fresh consideration after treating the proceedings as notice to the petitioner, with all contentions left open.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294415</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>