<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (4) TMI 495 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406379</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted a conditional stay on the collection/recovery of disputed demands, requiring the assessee to provide security worth Rs. 760 crores. The stay would be in effect for 180 days or until the appeal&#039;s disposal. Legal issues like the demand&#039;s validity without an assessment order, compliance with Section 2(19AA), and the impact of recent amendments to Section 254(2A) were highlighted. Garnishee proceedings were suspended pending the appeal&#039;s outcome.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2021 08:59:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=641653" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (4) TMI 495 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406379</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted a conditional stay on the collection/recovery of disputed demands, requiring the assessee to provide security worth Rs. 760 crores. The stay would be in effect for 180 days or until the appeal&#039;s disposal. Legal issues like the demand&#039;s validity without an assessment order, compliance with Section 2(19AA), and the impact of recent amendments to Section 254(2A) were highlighted. Garnishee proceedings were suspended pending the appeal&#039;s outcome.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406379</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>