<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (4) TMI 493 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406377</link>
    <description>The appeal regarding compliance with an order by the National Company Law Tribunal was dismissed. The Corporate Debtor failed to file a reply affidavit within the specified time frame despite extensions, citing reasons such as the pandemic and professional negligence. The Tribunal affirmed the Impugned Order, noting the delay in filing the appeal and lack of grounds for interference. The Appellant&#039;s request to set aside imposed costs and reopen the right to file a reply affidavit was rejected. The decision highlighted non-compliance with orders, delay in seeking remedy, and lack of justification for overturning the initial order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2021 10:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=641651" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (4) TMI 493 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406377</link>
      <description>The appeal regarding compliance with an order by the National Company Law Tribunal was dismissed. The Corporate Debtor failed to file a reply affidavit within the specified time frame despite extensions, citing reasons such as the pandemic and professional negligence. The Tribunal affirmed the Impugned Order, noting the delay in filing the appeal and lack of grounds for interference. The Appellant&#039;s request to set aside imposed costs and reopen the right to file a reply affidavit was rejected. The decision highlighted non-compliance with orders, delay in seeking remedy, and lack of justification for overturning the initial order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406377</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>