<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (4) TMI 492 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406376</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the imposition of a fine and penalty on the appellant was unsustainable when goods were allowed for re-export under Section 74 of the Customs Act, 1962. It set aside the impugned order, aligning with established legal precedents, and provided relief to the appellant by ruling against the penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Oct 2024 15:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=641650" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (4) TMI 492 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406376</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the imposition of a fine and penalty on the appellant was unsustainable when goods were allowed for re-export under Section 74 of the Customs Act, 1962. It set aside the impugned order, aligning with established legal precedents, and provided relief to the appellant by ruling against the penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406376</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>