https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406354 Admission of signature on a cheque in a Section 138 prosecution attracts the statutory presumptions under Sections 138 and 139, and objections about missing cheque, liability, or service of notice that depend on disputed facts are ordinarily matters for trial rather than quashing. Prima facie compliance with presentation, demand notice, and cause of action requirements was found sufficient at the threshold, and the purpose of Section 251 CrPC was satisfied where the substance of accusation was communicated and the statement recorded. Interim compensation under Section 143A was treated as permissible after the accused pleaded not guilty, with release of deposited or recovered amounts protected by sureties. en-us Fri, 26 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 13 Apr 2021 08:57:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406354 Admission of signature on a cheque in a Section 138 prosecution attracts the statutory presumptions under Sections 138 and 139, and objections about missing cheque, liability, or service of notice that depend on disputed facts are ordinarily matters for trial rather than quashing. Prima facie compliance with presentation, demand notice, and cause of action requirements was found sufficient at the threshold, and the purpose of Section 251 CrPC was satisfied where the substance of accusation was communicated and the statement recorded. Interim compensation under Section 143A was treated as permissible after the accused pleaded not guilty, with release of deposited or recovered amounts protected by sureties. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 26 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406354