<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 2025 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294408</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal in full, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on all contested issues. It upheld the deletion of additions under sections 68 and 41(1) and disallowances under section 43B and for business expenses. The Tribunal found no merit in the Revenue&#039;s arguments and confirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s findings, concluding that the evidence presented was sufficient and no additional evidence was improperly admitted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2024 14:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=641627" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 2025 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294408</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal in full, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on all contested issues. It upheld the deletion of additions under sections 68 and 41(1) and disallowances under section 43B and for business expenses. The Tribunal found no merit in the Revenue&#039;s arguments and confirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s findings, concluding that the evidence presented was sufficient and no additional evidence was improperly admitted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294408</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>