<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (2) TMI 45 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25164</link>
    <description>Section 4(1)(a) of the Gift-tax Act applies only when transferred property is shown, on relevant evidence, to have a market value higher than the consideration stated in the sale deed. The assessing authority must first determine that market value on proper data and then compare it with the stated consideration to decide whether the shortfall constitutes a deemed gift. If the Tribunal has not examined the correctness of the market value adopted by the Gift-tax Officer or recorded any finding on adequacy of consideration, it cannot conclude that the provision is inapplicable. The matter therefore required fresh determination of market value and consideration adequacy.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 17:10:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=64162" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (2) TMI 45 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25164</link>
      <description>Section 4(1)(a) of the Gift-tax Act applies only when transferred property is shown, on relevant evidence, to have a market value higher than the consideration stated in the sale deed. The assessing authority must first determine that market value on proper data and then compare it with the stated consideration to decide whether the shortfall constitutes a deemed gift. If the Tribunal has not examined the correctness of the market value adopted by the Gift-tax Officer or recorded any finding on adequacy of consideration, it cannot conclude that the provision is inapplicable. The matter therefore required fresh determination of market value and consideration adequacy.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25164</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>