<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (4) TMI 467 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406351</link>
    <description>The Madras HC ruled that while Section 143(2) notices are not mandatory under Section 153C assessments, natural justice principles must be observed through either such notices or Section 142(1) questionnaires. The court found violations of natural justice where the department failed to provide show cause notices regarding undisclosed property investments and ignored the petitioner&#039;s request for additional time to respond. Despite the department&#039;s excessive delay in centralizing cases and issuing notices, leaving minimal time for assessment completion, the court set aside the assessments and directed fresh proceedings within eight weeks, ensuring adequate opportunity for the petitioner to present submissions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2025 12:28:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=641517" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (4) TMI 467 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406351</link>
      <description>The Madras HC ruled that while Section 143(2) notices are not mandatory under Section 153C assessments, natural justice principles must be observed through either such notices or Section 142(1) questionnaires. The court found violations of natural justice where the department failed to provide show cause notices regarding undisclosed property investments and ignored the petitioner&#039;s request for additional time to respond. Despite the department&#039;s excessive delay in centralizing cases and issuing notices, leaving minimal time for assessment completion, the court set aside the assessments and directed fresh proceedings within eight weeks, ensuring adequate opportunity for the petitioner to present submissions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406351</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>