<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (4) TMI 458 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406342</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found the penalty notice invalid due to lack of specificity in specifying the charge against the assessee. The penalty order was deemed unjustified as the Assessing Officer failed to conduct a proper enquiry and relied on previous findings without verifying evidence. Consequently, the penalty of Rs. 74,12,046/- was deleted, and the appeal by the assessee was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2021 08:15:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=641508" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (4) TMI 458 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406342</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found the penalty notice invalid due to lack of specificity in specifying the charge against the assessee. The penalty order was deemed unjustified as the Assessing Officer failed to conduct a proper enquiry and relied on previous findings without verifying evidence. Consequently, the penalty of Rs. 74,12,046/- was deleted, and the appeal by the assessee was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406342</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>