<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (4) TMI 454 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406338</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal challenging the validity of re-opening assessments and upheld the disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) for surrogacy payments. The disallowance under Section 194J was reversed. Disallowance under Section 40(a)(i) for payments to foreign egg donors was deleted. The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals and directed the CIT-DR to inform the Ministry of Woman and Child Welfare about the exploitation of surrogate mothers.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Aug 2021 11:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=641504" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (4) TMI 454 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406338</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal challenging the validity of re-opening assessments and upheld the disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) for surrogacy payments. The disallowance under Section 194J was reversed. Disallowance under Section 40(a)(i) for payments to foreign egg donors was deleted. The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals and directed the CIT-DR to inform the Ministry of Woman and Child Welfare about the exploitation of surrogate mothers.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406338</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>