<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 2024 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294396</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming that disallowance under section 14A of the Income Tax Act cannot exceed the exempt income earned by the assessee. It clarified that only investments yielding exempt income should be considered for calculating the disallowance amount under Rule 8D. The Tribunal upheld the CIT (A) order directing the Assessing Officer to restrict the disallowance to the extent of exempt income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Apr 2021 11:27:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=641471" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 2024 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294396</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming that disallowance under section 14A of the Income Tax Act cannot exceed the exempt income earned by the assessee. It clarified that only investments yielding exempt income should be considered for calculating the disallowance amount under Rule 8D. The Tribunal upheld the CIT (A) order directing the Assessing Officer to restrict the disallowance to the extent of exempt income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294396</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>