<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (8) TMI 51 - ORISSA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25148</link>
    <description>For section 80J, &quot;capital employed&quot; excludes borrowed moneys, so deduction is confined to the assessee&#039;s own capital. The retrospective amendment by the Finance (No. 2) Act, 1980 was treated as consistent with the settled Supreme Court position and supported the Revenue&#039;s stand. As a result, the claimed relief under section 80J was not available on borrowed capital, and the challenge to the notice under section 263, with the connected writ relief, was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 16:33:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=64146" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (8) TMI 51 - ORISSA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25148</link>
      <description>For section 80J, &quot;capital employed&quot; excludes borrowed moneys, so deduction is confined to the assessee&#039;s own capital. The retrospective amendment by the Finance (No. 2) Act, 1980 was treated as consistent with the settled Supreme Court position and supported the Revenue&#039;s stand. As a result, the claimed relief under section 80J was not available on borrowed capital, and the challenge to the notice under section 263, with the connected writ relief, was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25148</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>