<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (4) TMI 423 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406307</link>
    <description>Binding precedent governed the disposal of these Special Leave Petitions: the Supreme Court followed the three-Judge Bench decision in Union of India v. G S Chatha Rice Mills and did not reach any contrary conclusion. On that basis, the Special Leave Petitions were dismissed and the pending applications were disposed of. The operative legal point is that the earlier three-Judge Bench ratio was treated as controlling for the matters before the Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Apr 2021 09:05:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=641441" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (4) TMI 423 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406307</link>
      <description>Binding precedent governed the disposal of these Special Leave Petitions: the Supreme Court followed the three-Judge Bench decision in Union of India v. G S Chatha Rice Mills and did not reach any contrary conclusion. On that basis, the Special Leave Petitions were dismissed and the pending applications were disposed of. The operative legal point is that the earlier three-Judge Bench ratio was treated as controlling for the matters before the Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406307</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>