<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (4) TMI 418 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406302</link>
    <description>Writ petitions challenged adjudication orders under the Jharkhand Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, together with garnishee notices issued for recovery. The Court considered only whether interim protection should be granted pending the State&#039;s counter affidavit, and no final view was taken on the legality of the notices or the tax demand. Interim stay was declined, so the recovery-related notices and adjudication proceedings were not stayed at that stage.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2025 17:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=641433" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (4) TMI 418 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406302</link>
      <description>Writ petitions challenged adjudication orders under the Jharkhand Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, together with garnishee notices issued for recovery. The Court considered only whether interim protection should be granted pending the State&#039;s counter affidavit, and no final view was taken on the legality of the notices or the tax demand. Interim stay was declined, so the recovery-related notices and adjudication proceedings were not stayed at that stage.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406302</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>